Why doing 'the greatest good for the greatest number' may not be the right thing to do: the complex moral landscape of disaster nursing

Jeffery F Evans

    Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

    134 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    A deconstruction of the greatest-good argument as used in disaster helathcare resource allocation and an arguemtn in favour of vurtue-based ethics in disaster nursing.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019
    Event7th International Disaster Nursing Conference "Disaster Risk Reduction Through Research and Education": Disaster Risk Reduction Through Research and Education - Militopia Hotel, Seoul, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
    Duration: 6 Sept 2018 → 7 Sept 2018
    https://nursing.chungbuk.ac.kr/board/download.php?id=op01&src=773&dnfile=1

    Conference

    Conference7th International Disaster Nursing Conference "Disaster Risk Reduction Through Research and Education"
    Abbreviated titleICDN7
    Country/TerritoryKorea, Republic of
    CitySeoul
    Period6/09/18 → 7/09/18
    Internet address

    Keywords

    • disaster nursing
    • Ethics

    Access to Document

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Why doing 'the greatest good for the greatest number' may not be the right thing to do: the complex moral landscape of disaster nursing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
      View full fingerprint

      Cite this