'What Works' and the Correctional Services Accreditation Panel: Taking stock from an inside perspective

Mike Maguire, Don Grubin, Frederich Lösel, Peter Raynor

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article provides an ‘insider’ perspective on the work of the Correctional Services Accreditation Panel (CSAP) of England and Wales, a key plank of the government’s ‘What Works’ strategy and in particular its aim of reducing re-offending through the development of ‘gold standard’, ‘evidence-based’ interventions (principally — but not exclusively — offending behaviour programmes). The article begins with a brief discussion of the concept of accreditation, its value and potential drawbacks. It then provides an account of CSAP’s working practices and some reflections on the results of its work so far, set against the background of challenges and tensions arising from a changing policy environment, resource constraints, mixed results from outcome studies, and debates about what some perceived as an over-narrow remit for accreditation. It concludes with some thoughts about possible future directions for CSAP or successor bodies with broadly similar goals.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)37 - 58
    Number of pages21
    JournalCriminology and Criminal Justice
    Volume10
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2010

    Keywords

    • probation
    • accreditation
    • offending behaviour programmes
    • prisons
    • 'What Works'

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''What Works' and the Correctional Services Accreditation Panel: Taking stock from an inside perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this