What methods for evaluating social prescribing work, for which intervention types, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review

Megan Elliott; Carolyn Wallace

What methods for evaluating social prescribing work, for which intervention types, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review

Megan Elliott, Carolyn Wallace

Welsh Institute for Health and Social Care

Research output: Book/Report › Other report

Abstract

Part of the ACCORD study
A social prescribing evaluation framework & reporting standard study

Original language	English
Number of pages	21
Publication status	Published - 6 May 2020

Cite this

@book{43c53d726eca487582d8bd3baddd9321,

title = "What methods for evaluating social prescribing work, for which intervention types, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review",

abstract = "Part of the ACCORD studyA social prescribing evaluation framework & reporting standard study",

author = "Megan Elliott and Carolyn Wallace",

year = "2020",

month = may,

day = "6",

language = "English",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - What methods for evaluating social prescribing work, for which intervention types, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review

AU - Elliott, Megan

AU - Wallace, Carolyn

PY - 2020/5/6

Y1 - 2020/5/6

N2 - Part of the ACCORD studyA social prescribing evaluation framework & reporting standard study

AB - Part of the ACCORD studyA social prescribing evaluation framework & reporting standard study

M3 - Other report

BT - What methods for evaluating social prescribing work, for which intervention types, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review

ER -

What methods for evaluating social prescribing work, for which intervention types, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this