TY - CONF
T1 - What Can the Neurodiversity Movement Offer Music Therapy?
AU - Grace Thompson
AU - Cochavit Elefant
AU - Efrat Roginsky
AU - Maren Metell
AU - Pickard, Beth
PY - 2019/6/29
Y1 - 2019/6/29
N2 - Three decades ago the term Neurodiversity was coined by a young woman with Asperger syndrome seeking to define her own unique identity (Singer, 2017). Since then, the term is associated with political advocacy that supports a rights-based disability agenda (Silverman, 2015). The Neurodiversity paradigm proposes that people's neurologically-based differences are no different to other social classifications such as gender and race (Singer, 2017).
The Neurodiversity movement challenges systems and interventions with “normalization” as the core agenda (Bascom, 2012). Instead, “maximization” of strengths and resources is encouraged, with advocates seeking to influence all levels of society, from policy to interpersonal, everyday practices. The deep humanistic inheritance of the music therapy profession (Abrams 2015), along with ecological and community paradigms that have become more prevalent in recent times are perhaps well aligned with the principles of neurodiversity. However, disability scholars have critiqued music therapy as supporting the medical model of disability and therefore risk contributing to oppression (Straus, 2011; Cameron, 2014). Perhaps the music therapy profession still has much to learn from disability advocates and critical theory about the potential ways that music can support the appreciation of diversity and performance of identity.
This round table will present reflections and perspectives from five music therapists working with several different populations in an effort to integrate our clinical experiences and discuss a fuller view of neurodiversity. Our discussion will focus on two main issues: our perceptions of neurodiversity advocacy, and the implications for music therapy practice with individuals with diverse conditions.
Abrams, B. (2015). Humanistic approaches. In B. L. Wheeler (Ed.) Music therapy handbook (p148-160). NY: The Guilford Press.
Ansdell, G. (2002). Community Music Therapy & the Winds of Change. A Discussion Paper Voices 2(2), July 1. Retrieved from: http://www.voices.no/mainissues/Voices2(2)ansdell.html
Bascom, J. (2012). Loud hands: Autistic people, speaking. Washington DC: Autism Self-Advocacy Network Press.
Cameron, C. (2014). Does Disability Studies have Anything to Say to Music Therapy? And Would Music Therapy Listen if it Did?. Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v14i3.794
Silberman, S. (2015). Neurotribes: The legacy of autism and how to think smarter about people who think differently. Atlantic Books.
Singer, J. (2017). Neurodiversity: The Birth of an idea. (Kindle Edition). Retrieved from Amazon.com
Straus, J. (2011). Extraordinary Measures: Disability in Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
AB - Three decades ago the term Neurodiversity was coined by a young woman with Asperger syndrome seeking to define her own unique identity (Singer, 2017). Since then, the term is associated with political advocacy that supports a rights-based disability agenda (Silverman, 2015). The Neurodiversity paradigm proposes that people's neurologically-based differences are no different to other social classifications such as gender and race (Singer, 2017).
The Neurodiversity movement challenges systems and interventions with “normalization” as the core agenda (Bascom, 2012). Instead, “maximization” of strengths and resources is encouraged, with advocates seeking to influence all levels of society, from policy to interpersonal, everyday practices. The deep humanistic inheritance of the music therapy profession (Abrams 2015), along with ecological and community paradigms that have become more prevalent in recent times are perhaps well aligned with the principles of neurodiversity. However, disability scholars have critiqued music therapy as supporting the medical model of disability and therefore risk contributing to oppression (Straus, 2011; Cameron, 2014). Perhaps the music therapy profession still has much to learn from disability advocates and critical theory about the potential ways that music can support the appreciation of diversity and performance of identity.
This round table will present reflections and perspectives from five music therapists working with several different populations in an effort to integrate our clinical experiences and discuss a fuller view of neurodiversity. Our discussion will focus on two main issues: our perceptions of neurodiversity advocacy, and the implications for music therapy practice with individuals with diverse conditions.
Abrams, B. (2015). Humanistic approaches. In B. L. Wheeler (Ed.) Music therapy handbook (p148-160). NY: The Guilford Press.
Ansdell, G. (2002). Community Music Therapy & the Winds of Change. A Discussion Paper Voices 2(2), July 1. Retrieved from: http://www.voices.no/mainissues/Voices2(2)ansdell.html
Bascom, J. (2012). Loud hands: Autistic people, speaking. Washington DC: Autism Self-Advocacy Network Press.
Cameron, C. (2014). Does Disability Studies have Anything to Say to Music Therapy? And Would Music Therapy Listen if it Did?. Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v14i3.794
Silberman, S. (2015). Neurotribes: The legacy of autism and how to think smarter about people who think differently. Atlantic Books.
Singer, J. (2017). Neurodiversity: The Birth of an idea. (Kindle Edition). Retrieved from Amazon.com
Straus, J. (2011). Extraordinary Measures: Disability in Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KW - neurodiversity movement
KW - humanism
KW - music therapy
M3 - Other
T2 - European Music Therapy Conference
Y2 - 26 June 2019 through 30 June 2019
ER -