W.B. Gallie, T.H. Marshall, and the Contested Concepts of Fairness and Citizenship: Examining the Parameters of Debate in Newport City Council’s Fairness Commission and Citizens’ Views on Fairness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The paper examines Newport City Council’s Fairness Commission’s (NFC) understanding of fairness, alongside a survey of Newport citizens’ views on fairness. These views focus on two parameters of debate identified by the NFC – equality versus differential treatment, and the accountability and transparency of decision-making – reflecting competing interpretations of the political concept of fairness, and as explored by W.B. Gallie. Moreover, these contested interpretations also have a profound bearing on post-1945 debates about citizenship instigated by T.H. Marshall. While many contemporary policy-recommenders and politicians reject Marshallesque social rights to citizenship, dismissing these rights as encouraging so-called ‘passive’ conceptions of citizenship emphasising unconditional individual entitlements to local services, the views of Newport citizens tend to broadly support these rights. These rights are distinct from ‘active’ conceptions, emphasising the values of interdependency and reciprocity, and citizens’ obligations to positively participate in community life which then underpin conditions for receiving entitlements.
Original languageEnglish
Article number7
Pages (from-to)485-505
Number of pages21
JournalLocal Government Studies
Volume42
Issue number3
Early online date7 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • social justice
  • social policy
  • political philosophy
  • fairness commissions
  • fairness
  • citizenship
  • local government
  • public attitude
  • public surveys
  • Gallie
  • Marshall

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'W.B. Gallie, T.H. Marshall, and the Contested Concepts of Fairness and Citizenship: Examining the Parameters of Debate in Newport City Council’s Fairness Commission and Citizens’ Views on Fairness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this