@inbook{feb4cc4c33584b52ba0e51aadce0cc6d,
title = "Toxic Controversies, the Online Imagining of {\textquoteleft}Blackwashing{\textquoteright}, and Anti-Fan Victimhood",
abstract = "This chapter addresses the hitherto unresearched topic of online audiences{\textquoteright} highly problematic claims of media {\textquoteleft}blackwashing{\textquoteright}, where non-white actors play white characters or take roles away from white actors. The chapter begins by charting whitewashing{\textquoteright}s empirical qualities in mainstream Western film and television, demonstrating long-standing traditions of racial marginalization and the hegemony of whiteness. Analysing Reddit and Quora threads and posts, the chapter subsequently explores how anti-fans conceptualise blackwashing in relation to whitewashing, whereby a post-racial conflation of the two terms creates a moral absolutism that neglects the latter{\textquoteright}s tangibility and, in turn, mythologizes the former. Consequently, racist knowledge economies maintain and extend digital toxic spatiality. The chapter then analyses how users{\textquoteright} moral absolutist stance develops a deontological ethical schema through which they criticise non-white media representations in three interconnected ways: 1) canonical fidelity to pre-existing franchise (trans)media characters; 2) accuracy of historical figures within media pertaining to race; and 3) blackwashing as a general practice in mainstream media. Emblematic of wider culture wars that seek to reclaim whiteness, such discourse neglects or fabricates media production political economies that overwhelmingly normalise whiteness in above- and below-the-line roles. Concurrently, the chapter argues blackwashing anti-fandom operates on a continuum of proximity with media objects: from intimate to distant engagement, to proto-anti-fandom towards what I term {\textquoteleft}imagined media{\textquoteright}; inverting Benedict Anderson{\textquoteright}s (1991) model of imagined communities served by media. Finally, the chapter triangulates blackwashing within general toxic online practices; extant myths of {\textquoteleft}reverse racism{\textquoteright}; and current socio-political relations including: civil rights protests and the perpetuation of white supremacy, white victimhood and {\textquoteleft}cancel culture{\textquoteright}, and post-truth politics, evidencing how anti-fandom intersects with wider ideological climates. Thus, the chapter develops the complexity of toxic fan practices, supports the growing body of work on race and fandom, and diversifies anti-fan discourse. ",
keywords = "online audiences, Media, media and cultural studies, race, racism, Diversity, popular culture, fan studies, anti-fandom, toxic cultures, Digital Media, social media, Reddit, Film, Television, Transmedia, Drama, Historical images, white victimhood, Quora",
author = "James Rendell",
year = "2025",
month = mar,
day = "6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781685970086",
series = "Fandom and Culture",
publisher = "University of Iowa Press",
pages = "213--230",
editor = "Simone Driessen and Bethan Jones and Benjamin Litherland",
booktitle = "Participatory Culture Wars: Controversy, Conflict and Complicity in Fandom",
}