Relational frame theory (RFT) is a modern, contextual behavioral theory of human language and cognition. A recent article by O’Connor, Farrell, Munnelly, and McHugh (2017) provided an updated citation analysis of data-based and nondata-based articles citing RFT-related terms as a proxy for the influence RFT has had on the scientific literature. Here, we evaluate the claims made by O’Connor et al. and suggest that caution should be exercised when interpreting some of their findings. Progress has, in many ways, clearly been made, but we argue that the growth in RFT outputs is more nuanced than at first appears.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-260
Number of pages6
JournalPsychological Record
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

    Research areas

  • Citation analysis, Relational frame theory

ID: 2216621