Quantifying the Empirical Growth of Relational Frame Theory Research: a Cautionary Note

Simon Dymond*, Richard May

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

139 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Relational frame theory (RFT) is a modern, contextual behavioral theory of human language and cognition. A recent article by O’Connor, Farrell, Munnelly, and McHugh (2017) provided an updated citation analysis of data-based and nondata-based articles citing RFT-related terms as a proxy for the influence RFT has had on the scientific literature. Here, we evaluate the claims made by O’Connor et al. and suggest that caution should be exercised when interpreting some of their findings. Progress has, in many ways, clearly been made, but we argue that the growth in RFT outputs is more nuanced than at first appears.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-260
Number of pages6
JournalPsychological Record
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Citation analysis
  • Relational frame theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying the Empirical Growth of Relational Frame Theory Research: a Cautionary Note'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this