On Internet Traffic Classification: A Two-Phased Machine Learning Approach

Taimur Bakhshi, Bogdan Ghita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Traffic classification utilizing flow measurement enables operators to perform essential network management. Flow accounting
methods such as NetFlow are, however, considered inadequate for classification requiring additional packet-level information, host
behaviour analysis, and specialized hardware limiting their practical adoption. This paper aims to overcome these challenges by
proposing two-phased machine learning classification mechanism with NetFlow as input. The individual flow classes are derived
per application through 𝑘-means and are further used to train a C5.0 decision tree classifier. As part of validation, the initial
unsupervised phase used flow records of fifteen popular Internet applications that were collected and independently subjected to 𝑘-
means clustering to determine unique flow classes generated per application. The derived flow classes were afterwards used to train
and test a supervised C5.0 based decision tree. The resulting classifier reported an average accuracy of 92.37% on approximately 3.4 million test cases increasing to 96.67% with adaptive boosting. The classifier specificity factor which accounted for differentiating content specific from supplementary flows ranged between 98.37% and 99.57%. Furthermore, the computational performance and accuracy of the proposed methodology in comparison with similar machine learning techniques lead us to recommend its extension to other applications in achieving highly granular real-time traffic classification.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2048302
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Computer Networks and Communications
Volume2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On Internet Traffic Classification: A Two-Phased Machine Learning Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this