Abstract
Background:
There is increasing reference to complex patient needs in health care. However, little is known about how to measure patient complexity or the relationship between it and district nursing activity.
Aim:
To illustrate the use of group concept mapping (GCM) to conceptualise and develop items for a patient complexity assessment instrument to be used by district nurses.
Discussion:
The first phase of this research used GCM conceptualisation and consensus methodology to identify items for a community-based patient complexity instrument. GCM helped to provide a conceptual understanding of community-based patient complexity through focused exploration of the term.
Results:
Indicated that a number of environmental, sociological, psychological, behavioural, physical and organisational factors needed to be included. This, in turn, showed that an existing taxonomy did not contain the relevant items. Consequently, amendments were made and a new instrument developed.
Conclusion:
GCM is a suitable consensus method for use in nursing theory and developing instruments. It proved successful in achieving consensus with no loss of participants’ views.
Implications for practice:
GCM is a suitable method for nurses to use in research or practice development activities as it is based on a facilitative and engagement-led approach.
There is increasing reference to complex patient needs in health care. However, little is known about how to measure patient complexity or the relationship between it and district nursing activity.
Aim:
To illustrate the use of group concept mapping (GCM) to conceptualise and develop items for a patient complexity assessment instrument to be used by district nurses.
Discussion:
The first phase of this research used GCM conceptualisation and consensus methodology to identify items for a community-based patient complexity instrument. GCM helped to provide a conceptual understanding of community-based patient complexity through focused exploration of the term.
Results:
Indicated that a number of environmental, sociological, psychological, behavioural, physical and organisational factors needed to be included. This, in turn, showed that an existing taxonomy did not contain the relevant items. Consequently, amendments were made and a new instrument developed.
Conclusion:
GCM is a suitable consensus method for use in nursing theory and developing instruments. It proved successful in achieving consensus with no loss of participants’ views.
Implications for practice:
GCM is a suitable method for nurses to use in research or practice development activities as it is based on a facilitative and engagement-led approach.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 9-13 |
| Journal | Nurse Researcher |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Mar 2016 |
Keywords
- group concept mapping
- concept mapping
- conceptualisation
- consensus
- mixed methods
- patient complexity
- district nurse
- community nurse
- Instrument development