TY - JOUR
T1 - Methods and approaches to advance soil macroecology
AU - White, Hannah J.
AU - León‐sánchez, Lupe
AU - Burton, Victoria J.
AU - Cameron, Erin K.
AU - Caruso, Tancredi
AU - Cunha, Luís
AU - Dirilgen, Tara
AU - Jurburg, Stephanie D.
AU - Kelly, Ruth
AU - Kumaresan, Deepak
AU - Ochoa‐Hueso, Raúl
AU - Ordonez, Alejandro
AU - Phillips, Helen R.P.
AU - Prieto, Iván
AU - Schmidt, Olaf
AU - Caplat, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
This review paper is the output from a ?Methods in Soil Macroecology? workshop as part of an early career researchers grant awarded to HJW and LLS. We thank the British Ecological Society Macroecology Special Interest Group for awarding this grant and the Institute for Global Food Security at Queen?s University Belfast for providing additional funds to run the workshop. Attendance of workshop participants was supported by individual funding: VJB was supported by the Royal Entomological Society Conference Participation Fund, EKC and HRPP were supported by the Academy of Finland (285882), TC was supported by the project SENSE (Structure and Ecological Niche in the Soil Environment; EC FP7 - 631399 - SENSE) and Natural Environment Research Council grant number NE/M017036/1, LC was supported by an EU Marie Curie fellowship (MSCA-IF-2014-GF-660378). HJW, LLS and PC were supported by Science Foundation Ireland and the Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland under grant number 15/IA/2881. We thank Bernard Kaye for producing Figure?1.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Motivation and aim: Soil biodiversity is central to ecosystem function and services. It represents most of terrestrial biodiversity and at least a quarter of all biodiversity on Earth. Yet, research into broad, generalizable spatial and temporal patterns of soil biota has been limited compared to aboveground systems due to complexities of the soil system. We review the literature and identify key considerations necessary to expand soil macroecology beyond the recent surge of global maps of soil taxa, so that we can gain greater insight into the mechanisms and processes shaping soil biodiversity. We focus primarily on three groups of soil taxa (earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria) that represent a range of body sizes and ecologies, and, therefore, interact with their environment at different spatial scales. Results: The complexities of soil, including fine-scale heterogeneity, 3-D habitat structure, difficulties with taxonomic delimitation, and the wide-ranging ecologies of its inhabitants, require the classical macroecological toolbox to be expanded to consider novel sampling, molecular identification, functional approaches, environmental variables, and modelling techniques. Main conclusions: Soil provides a complex system within which to apply macroecological research, yet, it is this property that itself makes soil macroecology a field ripe for innovative methodologies and approaches. To achieve this, soil-specific data, spatio-temporal, biotic, and abiotic considerations are necessary at all stages of research, from sampling design to statistical analyses. Insights into whole ecosystems and new approaches to link genes, functions and diversity across spatial and temporal scales, alongside methodologies already applied in aboveground macroecology, invasion ecology and aquatic ecology, will facilitate the investigation of macroecological processes in soil biota, which is key to understanding the link between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in terrestrial ecosystems.
AB - Motivation and aim: Soil biodiversity is central to ecosystem function and services. It represents most of terrestrial biodiversity and at least a quarter of all biodiversity on Earth. Yet, research into broad, generalizable spatial and temporal patterns of soil biota has been limited compared to aboveground systems due to complexities of the soil system. We review the literature and identify key considerations necessary to expand soil macroecology beyond the recent surge of global maps of soil taxa, so that we can gain greater insight into the mechanisms and processes shaping soil biodiversity. We focus primarily on three groups of soil taxa (earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria) that represent a range of body sizes and ecologies, and, therefore, interact with their environment at different spatial scales. Results: The complexities of soil, including fine-scale heterogeneity, 3-D habitat structure, difficulties with taxonomic delimitation, and the wide-ranging ecologies of its inhabitants, require the classical macroecological toolbox to be expanded to consider novel sampling, molecular identification, functional approaches, environmental variables, and modelling techniques. Main conclusions: Soil provides a complex system within which to apply macroecological research, yet, it is this property that itself makes soil macroecology a field ripe for innovative methodologies and approaches. To achieve this, soil-specific data, spatio-temporal, biotic, and abiotic considerations are necessary at all stages of research, from sampling design to statistical analyses. Insights into whole ecosystems and new approaches to link genes, functions and diversity across spatial and temporal scales, alongside methodologies already applied in aboveground macroecology, invasion ecology and aquatic ecology, will facilitate the investigation of macroecological processes in soil biota, which is key to understanding the link between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in terrestrial ecosystems.
KW - belowground
KW - biodiversity
KW - distribution
KW - macroecology
KW - soil
KW - spatial scale
U2 - 10.1111/geb.13156
DO - 10.1111/geb.13156
M3 - Article
SN - 1466-822X
VL - 29
SP - 1674
EP - 1690
JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography
JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography
IS - 10
ER -