Maximising engagement and participation of intellectual disability (ID) staff in research: insights from conducting a UK-wide survey

Clare Kar Kei Lam, Jane Bernal, Janet Finlayson, Stuart Todd, Laurence Taggart, Annette Boaz, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim:
This article explores ways of maximising engagement of intellectual disability staff as research participants, research advisers and research implementers.

Method:
The authors describe and reflect on a three-phased strategy in recruiting front-line staff (n = 690) working for intellectual disability service providers (n = 25) to participate in a UK-wide anonymous online survey about death, dying and bereavement.

Results:
Important elements in engaging participants were: involving stakeholders at all stages of the research process, which includes: building relationships with participating organisations; enlisting organisational management support at all levels; an attractive and well laid-out collection tool; a well-structured recruitment strategy; time and flexibility; and a varied and targeted dissemination strategy. However, the recruitment method had limitations, in particular around representativeness, bias and generalisability.

Conclusions:
Staff in intellectual disability services can be enthusiastic and invaluable research participants. Active engagement between researchers, participating organisations and stakeholder groups is key to ensuring involvement of intellectual disability staff with research.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disabilities
Volume00
Issue number00
Early online date12 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 May 2020

Keywords

  • Difficult topic
  • intellectual disabilities
  • staff
  • Response rates
  • survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Maximising engagement and participation of intellectual disability (ID) staff in research: insights from conducting a UK-wide survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this