Who is best placed to provide justice effectively and equitably to the breadth of Afghan society?

State and non-state justice providers are both part of the problem and potentially part of the solution. Despite significant strides being made in Afghanistan’s formal justice system, it still struggles to deliver an accessible and inclusive service. Widespread corruption and neglect especially in rural areas are among the most serious contemporary challenges.

Informal institutions are the primary justice provider for many communities, resolving disputes through jirgas, shuras and ulema where the formal sector is absent, exclusive or mistrusted. But traditional bodies also bring challenges, from poor record-keeping to gender exclusion, human rights violations and illicit practices. Taliban justice is also a significant feature of the
informal sphere.

A hybrid system that draws on formal and informal institutions can offer a way forward, linked by new institutions that prioritise human and women’s rights. A sophisticated hybrid model has previously been developed but has experienced resistance from
existing justice institutions. More recently there has been renewed interest in it from the Ministry of Justice and elsewhere.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIncremental Peace in Afghanistan
EditorsAnna Larson, Alexander Ramsbotham
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherConciliation Resources
Pages132-137
ISBN (Print)978-1-905805-26-6
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameAccord - an International Review of Peace Initiatives
PublisherConciliation Resources
Number27
ISSN (Print)2397-5598

    Research areas

  • Justice system, Afghanistan, equitable, inclusive, formal and informal systems of justice, Ministry of Justice

ID: 3053615