How to have the “ideal” Down syndrome screening discussion at antenatal appointments

Sophie John, Maggie Kirk, Emma Tonkin, Ian Stuart-Hamilton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    34 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This is the fourth in a series of papers published by BJM. The previous two papers inform midwifery practice by providing an insight into whether, to what extent and how cognitive status influences understanding of Down syndrome screening information, the importance of tailoring information and highlighting areas of communication that are effective in facilitating understanding. These findings led to the development of recommendations to inform a “best practice” model for midwifery communication of screening information within a conceptual framework that recognises the importance of accurate facts, empathic communication and support for decision-making, in a woman-centred approach.
    These recommendations may have wider relevance beyond midwife communication of Down syndrome screening and may impact upon the communication of other screening information provided within antenatal and neonatal screening. It is important that screening information is communicated effectively in light of changes to screening programmes, such as the introduction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)96-103
    Number of pages8
    JournalBritish Journal of Midwifery
    Volume28
    Issue number2
    Early online date7 Feb 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

    Keywords

    • Down syndrome
    • Screening
    • Patient information
    • Framework

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How to have the “ideal” Down syndrome screening discussion at antenatal appointments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this