Hollowing Out Probation?:  The roots of Transforming Rehabilitation

John Deering; Martina Feilzer

doi:10.1177/0264550518820119

Hollowing Out Probation? The roots of Transforming Rehabilitation

John Deering, Martina Feilzer

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article provides a critical perspective on the political and policy history of probation in England and Wales to develop a better understanding of how TR came to be. TR was only the latest act in a longstanding process of changing probation to fit ideological ‘flavours’, and we suggest that it is the hidden nature of probation work in combination with a lack of public legitimation work by probation institutions and probation staff that has placed probation in such a vulnerable position.

Original language	English
Article number	0264550518820119
Pages (from-to)	8-24
Number of pages	17
Journal	Probation Journal
Volume	66
Issue number	1
Early online date	28 Dec 2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550518820119
Publication status	Published - 2019

Keywords

probation
privatisation
organisational change
CJ legislations
organisational culture

Access to Document

10.1177/0264550518820119Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

2018_Hollowing_out_probationAccepted author manuscript, 593 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{252c344ba2de4fe4bc6ac0fb40102813,

title = "Hollowing Out Probation?: The roots of Transforming Rehabilitation",

abstract = "This article provides a critical perspective on the political and policy history of probation in England and Wales to develop a better understanding of how TR came to be. TR was only the latest act in a longstanding process of changing probation to fit ideological {\textquoteleft}flavours{\textquoteright}, and we suggest that it is the hidden nature of probation work in combination with a lack of public legitimation work by probation institutions and probation staff that has placed probation in such a vulnerable position.",

keywords = "probation, privatisation, organisational change, CJ legislations, organisational culture",

author = "John Deering and Martina Feilzer",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1177/0264550518820119",

language = "English",

volume = "66",

pages = "8--24",

journal = "Probation Journal",

issn = "0264-5505",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hollowing Out Probation?

T2 - The roots of Transforming Rehabilitation

AU - Deering, John

AU - Feilzer, Martina

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article provides a critical perspective on the political and policy history of probation in England and Wales to develop a better understanding of how TR came to be. TR was only the latest act in a longstanding process of changing probation to fit ideological ‘flavours’, and we suggest that it is the hidden nature of probation work in combination with a lack of public legitimation work by probation institutions and probation staff that has placed probation in such a vulnerable position.

AB - This article provides a critical perspective on the political and policy history of probation in England and Wales to develop a better understanding of how TR came to be. TR was only the latest act in a longstanding process of changing probation to fit ideological ‘flavours’, and we suggest that it is the hidden nature of probation work in combination with a lack of public legitimation work by probation institutions and probation staff that has placed probation in such a vulnerable position.

KW - probation

KW - privatisation

KW - organisational change

KW - CJ legislations

KW - organisational culture

U2 - 10.1177/0264550518820119

DO - 10.1177/0264550518820119

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 8

EP - 24

JO - Probation Journal

JF - Probation Journal

SN - 0264-5505

IS - 1

M1 - 0264550518820119

ER -

Hollowing Out Probation? The roots of Transforming Rehabilitation

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this