Fraternal Learning and interdependency: Celebrating Differences within Reciprocal Commitments

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    111 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The value of reciprocity is often promoted through contemporary policy-making. In contrast, political philosophers, through developing critiques of the Rawlsian conception of justice as reciprocity, have often argued against such a principle forming a basis for legitimating policies. This paper also offers a critique of contemporary policy-making but using a re-cast form of the Rawlsian justification of reciprocity. My main argument is that the Rawlsian premise of ‘sharing’ fates is too weak (by itself) to underpin reciprocity. However, reciprocity might be more securely based on the premise of learning from each other’s fates, given the diversity of individual experiences.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number4
    Pages (from-to)47-59
    Number of pages13
    JournalPolicy and Politics
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2002

    Keywords

    • reciprocity
    • justice
    • Ralws
    • diversity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Fraternal Learning and interdependency: Celebrating Differences within Reciprocal Commitments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this