Effectiveness of Online Programmes for Family Carers of People with Intellectual Disabilities: Systematic Review of the International Evidence Base

Rachel Leonard, Nathan Hughes, Trisha Forbes*, Michael Brown, Lynne Marsh, Maria Truesdale, Stuart Todd, Mark Linden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalSystematic Reviewpeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the evidence base on the effectiveness of online programmes on the mental health and well-being of family carers of people with intellectual disabilities. Databases (ERIC, Medline, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched for intervention studies that considered online interventions for family carers of people with intellectual disabilities. Data were extracted using standardised data extraction tools. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). Screening, extraction and assessment of bias were completed independently by two members of the research team. Given the low number of included studies and different outcomes assessed within them, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis; therefore, data are presented narratively. Two studies met the criteria to be included in the review. Both studies utilised a feasibility randomised controlled trial methodology. One study found a significant decrease in parental stress, while the other found a significant increase in psychological well-being. Caution must be taken in drawing firm conclusions, given the small sample sizes and low retention rates in both studies. Online programmes seem to offer potential benefits to family carers of people with intellectual disabilities. However, further investigation is needed to examine these programmes, adopting a collaborative approach with family carers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1349
Number of pages14
JournalHealthcare
Volume12
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • family carers
  • intellectual disability
  • systematic
  • review
  • online
  • Health and well-being

Cite this