Cross-disciplinary AI Supply Chain Risk Assessment

Angela Mison, Gareth Davies, Richard Ward

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

While AI remains chip based and part of both commercial and national strategic superiority goals, it is useful to examine the security and risks associated with achieving those goals. The future strategy rests perilously on an unstable inverted triangle of financial and economic reality. This paper presents the AI chip supply chain as an inverted triangle which base/apex is dependent on a global single supplier with the capability of producing equipment essential for their manufacture. It highlights the dependence on a single company for the fabrication of those chips, and the security risks associated with that supplier being Taiwanese in limited foreign ownership. It is suggested that the increasing tensions between China and the USA have resulted, in part, from this dependence, which was demonstrated by the supply chain crisis resulting from Covid-19. The attempt to reduce this dependence led to the CHIPS and Science Act 2022, signed into law by President Biden. In part of the inverted triangle are found Big Tech and the major Cloud Service Providers. They vary between 60% - 80% of their market capital being in financial institutional ownership, most of which is held by a very limited number of institutions, not all of whom are publicly quoted. To doubt the influence wielded by those financial institutions, just a single institution with major Big Tech and Cloud holdings has, at 31 December 2022, USD 8.59 trillion of assets under management. This represents economic power and places it between the equivalent Gross Domestic Product of China (USD 19.37 trillion) and Japan (USD 4.41 trillion) the second and third entries behind the USA in the GDP rankings. Financial institutions are market driven to achieve growth, contribute to economic stability, and are to an extent regulated by unelected vested interests and organisations. The battlefield for national supremacy of AI may concern chips, until the arrival of quantum AI. Current Chinese economic woes are providing the momentum for pre-emptive strikes at the semiconductor industry, and an inverted triangle is neither a secure nor stable structure for a supply chain.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ICCWS 2024)
Subtitle of host publicationUniversity of Johannesburg South Africa 26-27 March 2024
Pages185-190
Number of pages6
Volume19(1)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2024
Event19th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ICCWS 2024) - University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Duration: 26 Mar 202427 Mar 2024
Conference number: 19th
https://www.academic-conferences.org/conferences/iccws/

Publication series

NameInternational Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security
ISSN (Print)2048-9870
ISSN (Electronic)2048-9889

Conference

Conference19th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ICCWS 2024)
Abbreviated titleICCWS 2024
Country/TerritorySouth Africa
CityJohannesburg
Period26/03/2427/03/24
Internet address

Keywords

  • AI
  • Aladdin
  • GAMMA
  • TSMC
  • ASML

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-disciplinary AI Supply Chain Risk Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this