Abstract
Compound interest is a concept that, historically, has been tainted with an essentially mercantile flavour. It relates to the custom of banks in capitalising on the interest due by a client upon the expiry of a certain interval (the rest). Such practice, zealously vilified in some quarters, whilst acclaimed as a prosperous enterprise in others, has been challenged more recently at both judicial level and under statute, in the case of Italy. This contribution, in briefly recalling the origin of the concept of anatocism (the orthodox definition of compound interest) and,
therefore, its Roman predecessor, the usurarum usurae and the futurarum usurarum usurarae (usurae), seeks to examine the state-of-the-art apparatus applicable to compound interest in the English common law. Such deliberations will thereupon give rise to what this paper aspires to describe as a peculiar development. In this respect, attention is drawn to the recent Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the manner in which the bank customer is theoretica
therefore, its Roman predecessor, the usurarum usurae and the futurarum usurarum usurarae (usurae), seeks to examine the state-of-the-art apparatus applicable to compound interest in the English common law. Such deliberations will thereupon give rise to what this paper aspires to describe as a peculiar development. In this respect, attention is drawn to the recent Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the manner in which the bank customer is theoretica
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 174-200 |
Journal | Law and Economics Yearly Review |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |