Cervical range of motion and proprioception in rugby players versus non-rugby players

Sally D. Lark*, Peter W. McCarthy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effects of number of years of playing rugby on neck function. Active cervical spine range of motion and proprioception were assessed in 14 non-rugby-playing but trained sportsmen (mean age 28 years, s=7) and 46 rugby players (26 rugby forwards: mean age 26 years, s=5; mean years played 14 years; 20 backs: mean age 24 years, s=5; mean years played 14 years). Active cervical range of motion in flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion, plus left and right rotation were measured using a cervical range of motion device. The ability to reposition the head in a central position with eyes closed was taken as a measure of proprioception. Results show that rugby forwards generally had the least active cervical range of motion, particularly neck extension (forwards, 43° backs, 55° controls, 58°), with the decrement correlating with the number of years played. In addition, repositioning was significantly worse in rugby players after neck extension than non-rugby players (6° vs. 3°). The active cervical range of motion of rugby forwards is similar to that of whiplash patients, suggesting that participation in rugby can have an effect on neck range of motion that is equivalent to chronic disability. Reduced active cervical range of motion could also increase the likelihood of injury and exacerbate age-related neck problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)887-894
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Keywords

  • Cervical
  • Neck
  • Range of motion
  • Rugby
  • Spine
  • Whiplash

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cervical range of motion and proprioception in rugby players versus non-rugby players'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this