Abstract
Over the past decade a consensus has been emerging amongst policy makers, reform groups, voluntary agencies and academics that women offenders should be treated differently by the criminal justice system and in particular by the courts. This desire for differential treatment has culminated in the call for abolishing women’s imprisonment growing louder and gaining momentum. This chapter will explore the theoretical basis for this call for reform questioning ‘why’ women should be treated differently from men and trying to refine the way in which we think about women offenders as ‘different’. This chapter will discuss how and why women offenders’ status is depicted as that of victims, carers, oppressed, and/or offenders and whether a debate based on such reduced women’s status is sufficient to justify the call for a different approach to sentencing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Women and Criminal Justice |
Subtitle of host publication | From the Corston Report to Transforming Rehabilitation |
Editors | Jill Annison, Jo Brayford, John Deering |
Place of Publication | Bristol |
Publisher | Policy Press |
Pages | 195-215 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781447319313, 9781447319306 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- differential treatment
- sentencing
- women's imprisonment
- women's treatment