Biological methanation of CO2 in a novel biofilm plug-flow reactor: A high rate and low parasitic energy process

Savvas Savvas, Joanne Donnelly, Tim Patterson, Zyh Chong, Sandra Esteves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The performance of a novel biofilm plug flow reactor containing a mixed anaerobic microbial culture was investigated for the conversion of CO2/H2 to CH4. Unlike conventional gas-liquid contactors that depend on agitation, gas diffusion was decoupled from power consumption for mixing by increasing the gas phase inside the reaction space whilst increasing the gas residence time. The mixed mesophilic culture exhibited good biofilm formation and metabolic activity. Within 82 days of operation, 99% and 90% CH4 conversion efficiencies were achieved at total gas throughputs of 100 and 150 v/v/d, respectively. At a gas input rate of 230 v/v/d, methane evolution rates reached 40 v/v/d, which are the highest to date achieved by fixed film biomethanation systems. Significant gas transfer related parasitic energy savings can be achieved when using the novel plug flow design as compared to a CSTR. The results and modelling parameters of the study can aid the development of high rate, low parasitic energy biological methanation technologies for biogas upgrading and renewable power conversion and storage systems. The study has also established a reactor system which has the potential of accelerating biotechnology developments and deployment of other novel C1 gas routes to low carbon products.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-247
Number of pages20
JournalApplied Energy
Volume202
Early online date29 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Sept 2017

Keywords

  • Biomethanation
  • renewable energy storage
  • microbial catalyst
  • CO2
  • power-to-gas

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biological methanation of CO2 in a novel biofilm plug-flow reactor: A high rate and low parasitic energy process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this