TY - JOUR
T1 - Where’s Wallaby? Using public records and media reports to describe the status of red-necked wallabies in Britain
AU - English, Holly
AU - Caravaggi, Anthony
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank personnel from all LERCs in Britain for their correspondence, particularly Bedfordshire and Luton Biodiversity Recording and Monitoring Centre, Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre, Environmental Records Centre North East, Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service, Staffordshire Ecological Record, Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre, Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre, Warwickshire Biological Records Data, and Wiltshire and Swindon Biological Records Centre, all of which provided data. We are particularly grateful to those individuals who submit their wildlife records to data centers, without whom this and many other studies would not be possible. We acknowledge Denise O'Meara and Matthew Grainger for their feedback on a previous draft, Louise Bright and Nicholas Roberts of USW for covering the APC, and Pauline Toni and two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly strengthened the manuscript. We also thank Darren Naish for providing the original impetus for this project and, subsequently, highlighting new records in the media. HME is funded by an Irish Research Council Government of Ireland postgraduate scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/3
Y1 - 2020/11/3
N2 - Investigating the range and population dynamics of introduced species provides insight into species behavior, habitat preferences, and potential of becoming established. Here, we show the current population status of the red-necked wallaby (Notamacropus rufogriseus) in Britain based on records from an eleven-year period (2008–2018). Records were obtained from Local Environmental Records Centres (LERCs), the National Biodiversity Network (NBN), and popular media. All records were mapped and compared to a historical distribution map (1940–2007), derived from published data. A total of 95 confirmed wallaby sightings were recorded between 2008 and 2018, of which 64 came from media sources, 18 from Local Environmental Records Centres (LERCs), seven from the National Biodiversity Network (NBN), and six from the published literature (Yalden, Br. Wildl., 24, 2013, 169). The greatest density of wallaby sightings was in southern England, with the Chiltern Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty a particular hot spot (n = 11). More sightings were recorded in August than in any other month. Much of the species’ ecology and responses to British biota and anthropogenic pressures are unknown, and therefore, further research is warranted. The methods used here are widely applicable to other non-native species, particularly those that the public are more likely to report and could be an important supplement to existing studies of conservation and management relevance.
AB - Investigating the range and population dynamics of introduced species provides insight into species behavior, habitat preferences, and potential of becoming established. Here, we show the current population status of the red-necked wallaby (Notamacropus rufogriseus) in Britain based on records from an eleven-year period (2008–2018). Records were obtained from Local Environmental Records Centres (LERCs), the National Biodiversity Network (NBN), and popular media. All records were mapped and compared to a historical distribution map (1940–2007), derived from published data. A total of 95 confirmed wallaby sightings were recorded between 2008 and 2018, of which 64 came from media sources, 18 from Local Environmental Records Centres (LERCs), seven from the National Biodiversity Network (NBN), and six from the published literature (Yalden, Br. Wildl., 24, 2013, 169). The greatest density of wallaby sightings was in southern England, with the Chiltern Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty a particular hot spot (n = 11). More sightings were recorded in August than in any other month. Much of the species’ ecology and responses to British biota and anthropogenic pressures are unknown, and therefore, further research is warranted. The methods used here are widely applicable to other non-native species, particularly those that the public are more likely to report and could be an important supplement to existing studies of conservation and management relevance.
KW - Notamacropus rufogriseus
KW - non-native species
KW - population dynamics
KW - macropod
KW - biological records
U2 - 10.1002/ece3.6877
DO - 10.1002/ece3.6877
M3 - Article
C2 - 33304507
SN - 2045-7758
VL - 10
SP - 12949
EP - 12959
JO - Ecology and Evolution
JF - Ecology and Evolution
IS - 23
ER -