Crynodeb
Purpose
Covid-19 has caused many businesses to rethink their short and potentially long-term workforce operations. The use of lateral flow serology can provide a clinically
convenient approach for the assessment of prior infection with Covid-19. However, its widespread adoption in organisations seeking to use it to test for workforce immunity is controversial and confusing. This paper explores the paradoxical dilemmas and dialectics immunity workforce testing creates.
Methodology
This study adopts an interpretivist perspective, based upon data generated from the present CEO of a private service-based clinic. The fieldwork consisted of two semistructured interviews with the CEO. Data analysis was performed using cyclic thematic indexing whereby interview transcripts were color-coded to indicate discussions and issues that pertained to Smith and Lewis (2011) interpretation of dilemmas and dialectics.
Findings
Providing staff with immunity tests at first glance appears sensible, decent and a caring action to take. Nevertheless, once such knowledge is personalised by the workforce they can through dialectic dialogue feel disadvantaged and harbour feelings of unfairness. Subsequently this paper suggest that immunity testing may only serve to Management raise awareness and deepen the original management dilemma of whether testing is a worthwhile activity.
Originality
This paper aims to be amongst the first works to empirically explore the workforce management challenges that arise within small businesses within the service sector following the completion of Covid-19 immunity testing of their staff. It seeks to achieve this via utilizing the robust theoretical framework of paradox theory to examine Covid-19’s impact upon small business workforce management thinking and practice.
Covid-19 has caused many businesses to rethink their short and potentially long-term workforce operations. The use of lateral flow serology can provide a clinically
convenient approach for the assessment of prior infection with Covid-19. However, its widespread adoption in organisations seeking to use it to test for workforce immunity is controversial and confusing. This paper explores the paradoxical dilemmas and dialectics immunity workforce testing creates.
Methodology
This study adopts an interpretivist perspective, based upon data generated from the present CEO of a private service-based clinic. The fieldwork consisted of two semistructured interviews with the CEO. Data analysis was performed using cyclic thematic indexing whereby interview transcripts were color-coded to indicate discussions and issues that pertained to Smith and Lewis (2011) interpretation of dilemmas and dialectics.
Findings
Providing staff with immunity tests at first glance appears sensible, decent and a caring action to take. Nevertheless, once such knowledge is personalised by the workforce they can through dialectic dialogue feel disadvantaged and harbour feelings of unfairness. Subsequently this paper suggest that immunity testing may only serve to Management raise awareness and deepen the original management dilemma of whether testing is a worthwhile activity.
Originality
This paper aims to be amongst the first works to empirically explore the workforce management challenges that arise within small businesses within the service sector following the completion of Covid-19 immunity testing of their staff. It seeks to achieve this via utilizing the robust theoretical framework of paradox theory to examine Covid-19’s impact upon small business workforce management thinking and practice.
| Iaith wreiddiol | Saesneg |
|---|---|
| Nifer y tudalennau | 14 |
| Cyfnodolyn | Journal of Work-Applied Management |
| Cyfrol | 00 |
| Rhif cyhoeddi | 00 |
| Dyddiad ar-lein cynnar | 18 Chwef 2021 |
| Dynodwyr Gwrthrych Digidol (DOIs) | |
| Statws | Cyhoeddwyd - 18 Chwef 2021 |