TY - JOUR
T1 - Aegean monkeys and the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration in archaeoprimatology: a reply to Urbani and Youlatos
AU - Pareja, Marie Nicole
AU - Mckinney, Tracie
AU - Setchell, Joanna M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the Archaeological Institute of America and the Ancient Painting Studies Interest Group for the opportunity to present the preliminary results of this study. M.?N.?P.?C. personally thanks Robert Arnott, Tristan Carter, Anne P. Chapin, Tiffany L. Hunt, Jonathan M. Kenoyer, Leanna Kolonauski, and Doug Morrow for their thoughts on, and enthusiasm for, this project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Japan Monkey Centre and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/9/5
Y1 - 2020/9/5
N2 - In their reply to our article “A new identification of the monkeys depicted in a Bronze Age wall painting from Akrotiri, Thera” [Primates 61(3), 2019], Urbani and Youlatos (Primates https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1032 9-020-00825 -2, 2020) argue for the traditional identification of the monkeys depicted on the north and west walls of Room 6 of Building Complex Beta at Akrotiri, Thera, as vervet monkeys (Fig. 1). Their argument is based largely on previous scholarship and their analysis of monkey morphology as it appears in this Bronze Age artwork. Here, after clarifying some misconceptions and misquotations, we thoroughly contextualize the wall painting in question, emphasizing the importance of collaboration between disparate disciplines for a multifaceted and rigorous approach. The nature of the item in question is key in this reply: it is an artwork. Because the artwork in question is a cultural representation of monkeys rather than a study of live primates or preserved specimens, consideration of artistic choice, color conventions, and the agency of the artist, which are importantfacets of material culture, is important when answering the questions raised by Urbani and Youlatos, and should stimulate further cross-disciplinary discussions.
AB - In their reply to our article “A new identification of the monkeys depicted in a Bronze Age wall painting from Akrotiri, Thera” [Primates 61(3), 2019], Urbani and Youlatos (Primates https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1032 9-020-00825 -2, 2020) argue for the traditional identification of the monkeys depicted on the north and west walls of Room 6 of Building Complex Beta at Akrotiri, Thera, as vervet monkeys (Fig. 1). Their argument is based largely on previous scholarship and their analysis of monkey morphology as it appears in this Bronze Age artwork. Here, after clarifying some misconceptions and misquotations, we thoroughly contextualize the wall painting in question, emphasizing the importance of collaboration between disparate disciplines for a multifaceted and rigorous approach. The nature of the item in question is key in this reply: it is an artwork. Because the artwork in question is a cultural representation of monkeys rather than a study of live primates or preserved specimens, consideration of artistic choice, color conventions, and the agency of the artist, which are importantfacets of material culture, is important when answering the questions raised by Urbani and Youlatos, and should stimulate further cross-disciplinary discussions.
KW - Art
KW - Bronze Age Aegean
KW - Exchange
KW - Indus
KW - Langur
U2 - 10.1007/s10329-020-00855-w
DO - 10.1007/s10329-020-00855-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 32889632
SN - 0032-8332
VL - 61
SP - 767
EP - 774
JO - Primates
JF - Primates
IS - 6
ER -